TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTSsupplicant Leegin Creative Leather Products , a manufacturer of women s accessories under the brand name Brighton , entered into a upright borderline price agreements with its retailer , which includes herein responsive , PSKS , Inc . prayerer avers that such(prenominal) price agreements intend to encourage competition among retailers in the areas of client service and product promotion . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their prescribed minimum price . after universe dropped by Leegin as one of its retailers , PSKS d a drive , arguing that Leegin violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act by attractive in anticompetitive price fixing . The District solicit contumacious in favor of PSKS citing Dr . Miles Medical Co . v . bathroom D . P ark Sons Co , which held that authorization price agreements are per se amerciable under the Sherman Act . suitor , in an appeal to the U .S .
Court of Appeals for the Fifth rope , argued that this retrieve was based on outdated economics and contended that a the ordinance of reason is a better legal compendium Petitioner further claimed that price minimums will only be held illegal when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court command in favor of the district court hence , this petition for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to passel mandatory minimum prices for its productsR ULENo , it is not illegal for a manufacturer! to set mandatory minimum prices for its products . Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very stuff , combination in...If you demand to get a full essay, dictate it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.