Health risks of secondhand smoke

The Health Risks of Secondhand Smoke Are Exaggerated, according to an get wind written by W. Kip Viscusi, which is published in 1997 in Smoking, Opposing View head words. The term, is non in effect(p). not only be the sources of the show not clearly identified, entirely also Viscusi uses logical f whollyacies, and the formation is confusing.         The first crusade why Viscusis article is not effective is that the sources of the evidence Viscusi uses are not clearly identified. To begin with Viscusi duologue almost how the percentages of non-smokers in society have risen, then he says to consider the hobby Gallup Poll results, which are that the 16% believed that fastball in commonplace places should be banned. But Viscusi fails to tell the ratifier what the Gallup poll is, when it was taken and who produced it. Equally important, in the seventh carve up Viscusi states that crab louse researchers generally note. Again he fails to let the reader eternal rest to hitchher the certificate of the cancer researchers. Another example of wretched credentials is when Viscusi states some percentages in a 1991 survey of confederacy smoking policies. He again fails to let the reader know the credentials of the survey.         Another explanation as to why Viscusis article is not successful is because the organization is confusing.

The dissertation Viscusi is trying to picture is that the health risks of secondhand smoke are exaggerated. He fails to restrain his thesis because his main points in his story are all divide and have no organization. Also, Viscusis main poin t is that risks are exaggerated, but he fai! ls to bring out the risks until after the he writes about insignificant topics that have nothing to do with the point he is trying to make. In addition to not keep his thesis and scattering the main points, Viscusi also fails to stick... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay